|
 |
 |
 |
 |

Real-time Hollywood T1 Rate Quotes!
Finding pricing for high-speed internet (broadband) and commerical telephone service
(call centers) in Hollywood has been greatly simplified with online software I recently published
called GeoQuote. This revolutionary technology actually measures how far away
your are from each of the 12 major long distance carrier's facilities and calculates
with 99% accuracy the best price they can offer you. Shopping for a t1 line
is now just as easy as booking a flight on CheapRates.
|
|
 |
|
GeoQuote provides T1 rate quotes for the following service providers:
|
|
|
|
|
Here's how this t1 rate quote search engine works:
- Enter your information in the form above.
- Receive real-time unbiased T1 line prices from ShopforT1.
- Select the T1 price plans that interest you.
- An independent consultant will contact you to discuss the details of the T1 connection, confirm pricing, and assist you with the signup process.
View a Sample Quote Here
|
|
|
Other Related Searches
As a courtesy to you, we've provided a list of search keywords used by others to
who have been looking for t1 internet service:
|
|
|
|
|
Prices Continue to Come Down on Integrated Products
Thursday November 13, 2008,
04:49 pm ET
CEDAR HILLS, Utah, Nov. 13 /Patrick Oborn/ --
Higher productivity for small to medium sized businesses is just around the corner thanks
to commercial grade broadband services that are now being delivered at a fraction of their
previous cost. Due to the ever increasing competitive marketplace and a mad dash to consolidate
networks, telecoms are offering their premium business services to small businesses for a fraction
of what they used to cost just a few years ago. Businesses who use more than four regular phone
lines can now upgrade to dynamic integrated T-carrier circuits for the same price.
From 1997 to 2007, the average cost of a POTS (plain old telephone service) line from the
Bells has hovered in the $50 - $80 per month price range. During this same time period,
integrated DS1 (digital signal 1) lines - which is the equivalent of 24 standard lines -
have come down in price from $1000 per month to $400. Small to medium size businesses
who have more than 5 phone lines can now actually save money by upgrading their service.
At $50 to $75 per month, the average small business telephone customer could expect to pay
up to $750 for just 10 regular phone lines, which come with only a standard set of features
such as Voicemail, Caller ID, and Three-way calling. From 2000 to 2005, the cost of a
dynamic integrated T1 line was well over $800, making it an unattractive option from a
pure cost point of view. However, that paradigm has changed with the introduction of
sub-$400/month price plans and features that make the old POTs lines look pre-historic.
Is the era of the analog trunk, or bundle of 24 DS-0 (64 kbps) channels,
officially over? Possibly, thanks to the two-for-the-price-of-one features
of a dynamic integrated T1, which can function exactly like a pure 1.5 mbps
data T1 when no one is one the phone, and allocate required bandwidth
for voice traffic when a user initiates a phone call. Likewise, as soon
as the client terminates the voice session, the 64 KB is re-assigned back
to the digital universe. This switch-hitting capability provides all
of the feel and function of a data T1 and voice T1, for a fraction of the price.
Once a forgotten segment of the business telecommunication landscape, small to medium
size businesses are finally being serviced with products (like the dynamic integrated
T1 line) at prices they can afford. Gone are the days when the Bells can shove TDM
services down the collective throats of SMB's at prices that resemble a mortgage rather
than a telephone service.
Hopefully the CLECs can continue to push the boundaries of innovation and economics.
The only thing that can keep them from the promise land is the gatekeeper of competition:
the Federal Communications Commission, and the huge Bells (AT&T and Verizon - that's you)
who make it a point to spend more money lobbying in Washington DC than Exxon Mobile.
|
|
|
|